Wed 11 Apr 2007
More Michaelle and Less Elizabeth = Less Canada
Posted by kaqchikel under corruption , culture , leadership & leaders , multiculturalism , regal & vice-regal affairsHer Excellency the Right Honourable
Michaà lle Jean, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D., Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada
Her predecessor once called herself the new Head of State. This Governor General believes that Rideau Hall is HER house and she is in command of Canada.
Michaelle Jean is hell-bent on changing not just the look but the texture and flavour of Rideau Hall as though it were her own private residence. In the process she wants to change Canadians. She is achieving that task in the name of Canada and Canadian art, though the motivation seems to fashion the Queen’s residence in her own image. Mostly, she is in the business of erecting a monument to herself.
The changes have continued, as a tour this week revealed, and are part of a deliberate effort by Ms. Jean to make the home more relevant, contemporary and a showcase for Canadian work that reflects stories about Canada. But as a result, Ms. Jean, who is an avid art lover, is highlighting paintings that draw less and less on the office's British traditions.
While the governor-general represents the Queen in this country, the increased emphasis on Canada means less on the royal family past or present. The Lemieux portrait is the only one of the Queen on display. "That's it as far as Her Majesty is concerned," said Fabienne Fusade, interpretation and exhibition planner at Rideau Hall. "We really want to create a Canadian interior. So some of the old furniture pieces, part of our history, they are very important, we don't want to get rid of them but … it is all about Canada."
The changes include a gradual shift to modernize the art that predates Ms. Jean's time in office. No longer in the residence: a more traditional portrait of the Queen, as well as images of the Queen's father, King George VI, and the Queen Mother that once graced the entrance. They are now in the Senate.
Where is the dignity of Jeanne Sauve, our fist woman governor general? Sauve showed that female governor-generals do not have to be consumed by personal preoccupations with fashion and interior decor. As usually, souls of significant depth do not concern themselves so highly with the world of appearance. Mostly, Sauve showed that a female GG does not have to be absorbed with oneself when one understand the purpose of the position.
Since Romeo Leblanc (who succeeded Mme Sauve), two consecutive Liberal prime minister have bequeathed to Rideau Hall, to the country, larger egos than our whole 10 million square kilometres of geography. Worse, these giant egos are closet republicans. Their republican souls render the last two GGs incapable of understanding the role of the Crown and Her Majesty’s position. They think of the Queen as arrogance, and arrogance is what they offer to represent her, so unschooled they are on what it means to serve, and how this Queen has lived her life.
Michaelle Jean the latest example: she is a half-breed born in Haiti. Today Haiti is the poorest and more backward country in the hemisphere, and it was no different then. She was born to privilege in a country where less black heritage usually implies better social status. There, her whiteness was emphasized, alongside a pretentious concern for the darker peasants. Now she is in Canada where more black is politically advantageous, unless one is driving a taxi in Montreal.
Jean was a separatist not all that long ago, but now she is Paul Martin’s legacy to represent our Queen. Jean is a chameleon with no recognisable publicly established image; she will change into whatever she needs to change in order to advance herself. As a separatist, she worked for the national broadcaster. As a republican, she represents the Crown in Canada. She now pretends to be concerned with the whiter Canadian peasant’s identity.
Jean thinks that by stripping Rideau Hall of British iconography and symbols she is going to make Canadians more Canadian. It presupposes that Jean knows what being Canadian means, of course, which she does not. Hers exhibits a republican attitude most typically found among Quebec dilettantes. It’s not distinctly Canadian. Being Canadian, for better or for worse, includes our historical ties to Britain as much as it does imperial France.
Being Canadian is in part being British; our very constitution is based on that premise. Not just the written one, but the one that accumulates our traditions and dispositions in our memories and actions. Jean’s project is a project that warps our collective civic memory, though there is a tradition of doing such things among Liberals since Pearson (fittingly we mostly name airports in central Canada after them). Her Canadian history probably goes that far. She ignores that a denial of our British heritage is a denial of our own selves.
Michaelle Jean’s understanding of being Canadian is not in keeping with the whole of Canada and is not in keeping with the political traditions upon which most of this country was based. The British Monarchy has been around for a millennium; Jean is a arrived in Canada in the late 1960s. Her arrogance toward Her Majesty and things monarchical is an arrogance against all Canadians who value our political traditions and historical roots. Jean’s souls is fundamentally trudeauvian: she would minimize the great institution of the Monarchy and the Queen herself in order to aggrandize her own self.
In the typical Canadian Liberal tradition, Michaelle Jean is a woman without tradition; she is a woman without a past; she is a woman without identity in search of making one up. In the absence of all these, much of what fills her soul is a concern for power. She suffers from what most condescending liberal politicians of this age are afflicted with: the assumption that they know better than the common Canadian peasant, a desire to improve us whether we want it or not, and a will to transform us or our country as a means to leave us “a legacy” –that “legacy” is a way to erect a monument to themselves in our warped civic memory.
More Michaelle and less Elizabeth amounts to less Canada. Monarchist and republican Canadians, we are all poorer for having self-importance incarnate presently dwelling Rideau Hall. It stands to reason that the man guided by nothing other than the single-minded aspiration of becoming prime minister would be the one who chose her to be our governor general. The void of substance recognized itself.
——————-
And now for some political gossip.
This anecdote has been circulating Ottawa for months: When Alex Himmelfarb, Paul Martin’s Clerk of the Privy Council, had finished briefing the Harper Conservative transition team on the Hill, he said his goodbyes and well wishes, grabbed his coat and his hat and headed toward the door. As he had crossed the threshold, he turned around retracing a few of his steps into the room and said something like: “Good luck with that woman. She is the most difficult person to deal with in this whole operation.” Stunned, people in the room asked “Who?” The one in Rideau Hall, he said, and off he went. A pearl of wisdom! That was the Clerk for the very liberal prime minister who chose her. One can only imagine what stories Kevin Lynch and others will have to tell.
A wonderful post. Th Crown is integral to our constitution. One of the many reasons I despise the gritys is their relentless campaign of republicanism by stealth. We should all conatct Rideau Hall. It is Our Queen’s house!
Ridicules antiquated ideas of royals is better left in the 1800’s.
The queen is both pointless and a needless expense, same for the GG.
While we can remember our constitutional roots we should realize we are no longer a member of the commonwealth nor British subjects, time to move on.
I remember reading a profile in The New Yorker of Harold Wilson, Britain’s Labour PM during the 1970s.
On becoming the Prime Minister, he had been greatly annoyed to discover that he was required to meet with the Queen once a week, to go over the nation’s business in the “Red Boxes,” a requirement of all PMs. As a member of the Labour Party he had no fondness for Royalty and thought that this hour spent with the Queen, would be, in fact, a Royal waste of time.
It was wonderful to read how his opinion of Queen Elizabeth II changed. He said that he was astonished at how knowledgeable she was of world and Commonwealth affairs and how generous she was in sharing her knowledge and wisdom gained from her many years as the British Monarch.
He discovered that she was an extremely hard working and deeply engaged woman, and he found himself looking forward to his weekly meetings with her.
Michaelle Jean would do well to do some homework about her adopted land and the Monarch she represents. It is the height of arrogance to assume that she knows better than we do–and to go about making changes to create Rideau Hall in her image. What gall.
I was distressed when Paul Martin appointed her the GG, and feel that her appointment was the Liberals’ slap in the face to Royalist and conservative Canadians. I still do.
Time to enter the 21st century and leave the 19th behind. We need to rid ourselves of the monarchy and elect our head of state and make that person leader of the executive branch. We can then choose the best person to lead the government and he could choose the best persons available to make up his/her cabinet. Then we would elect a legislative branch to hold the executive accountable. The mishmash we have now has led us to failed state status until we were able to elect PMSH.
K, great post. Like it or not, the monarchy remains an important, even if only cosmetic, part of our culture, our heritage and our parliamentary democracy.
Anybody sure that Imus wasn’t talkin’ bout Jean here too?
You are just a stupid racist bitch. If she were white all you assholes would not be having such a “problem” with this fabulous classy woman. Get over it!!!!
Robert: You sure have shown such excellent class in your reply as to leave no doubt that you must know class when you see it.
While it would be unfair to judge Michaelle Jean solely by the highly cultured and articulate nature of her apologists, those two are not always disconnected.
Die already.
I co-sign what Robert said. Apparently only white people should aspire to certain positions in this tired backward country.
The Governor General of Canada is a “corporation sole”, according to Elizabeth II. A “corporation sole” is defined and recognized as being a corporation.
It is a fiction that a corporation is a person.
“A corporation is a fiction, by definition, …” according to Patrick Healy in a statement to Parliament’s Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in 2002.
“A corporation is a ‘fiction’ as it has no separate existence, no physical body and no ‘mind’”, according to Joanne Klineberg in a presentation to the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar in 2004.
Robert / matthew:
It must be even more tiring pretending to be two people: