I am trying to find recent (last 4 years) studies or polls by Canadian research institutes relating to stem cell research in Canada or that would affect Canadians? It doesn’t really matter what exactly the research is about as long as it concerns stem cells.
I have been having a great deal of difficulty finding CANADIAN research studies and polls. I have been asked to do a report on stem cells but I can only use Canadian studies/polls.
Also, a classmate of mine who knows somewhat about stem cell research in Canada said that Canadian researchers are quite behind in research and tend to get information from European studies. Is this true?
If anyone knows of any Canadian studies, feel free to tell me!
The sound of a nation collectively unclenching. Spontaneous parties at intersections at Yonge & Eglinton, Yonge & Bloor, and Yonge & Dundas in Toronto, Canada. This was shot at Yonge & Bloor about 1 hour after winning the olympic hockey gold medal game.
I just think a lot of Conservatives can broaden their perspective on what it means to be globally Conservative if they merge ideas with the Conservative Party of Canada.
The USA Conservative people could take fiscal policy lessons from Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada, who is doing an outstanding job with managing Chrysler’s subsidiaries in Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Why don’t USA Conservatives explore what it means to be Conservative in Canada? Canadian Conservatives have family values practices that can guide USA Conservatives.
For example, values where the health of family should be denied to nobody regardless of their ability to pay for insurance because it’s a fundamental right, just like the culture of life.
Also USA Conservatives believe in a right to life and likewise Canadian Conservatives do not support capital punishment for that reason.
USA Conservatives believe in freedom and liberty and so do Canadian Conservatives, that’s why you are free in Manitoba, Canada to Harvest Hemp seeds where in USA it’s illegal.
US Conservatives do not believe in government coercion and so do Canadian Conservatives, that’s why Canadian Conservatives would never coerce the leader of a foreign country, Iraq, to disarm or be disarmed.
USA Conservatives believe in profitable energy independence and so do Canadian Conservatives, that’s why Canadian Conservatives get their oil from Alberta crude and not from Saudi Arabia.
USA Conservatives believe in free enterprise, so do Canadian Conservatives. That’s why Canadian Conservatives believe not in “buy Canada only” or “Buy American” slogans but instead believe in supplying Softwood Lumber just like America freely provides Cinema.
So why can’t USA Conservatives assemble with Canadian Conservatives?
Also Obama people should be closer to Ignetieff.
And Ralph Nader should get to know Elizabeth May.
and Dennis Kucinich should become friends with Jack Layton.
And Sotomayor should become friends with Gil Duceppe.
and in Canada religion is valued highly enough that no Government or state has the right to intervene or use religion or faith as a tool for any legislative policy or initiative. What is this “faith-based” initiative stuff?
FYI I’m American, not Canadian, I just know a lot about my neighbors (neighbours) to the north
An ad by the Liberal Party of Canada for the January 2006 Parliamentary elections in which Prime Minister Paul Martin was defeated by Conservative Party Leader Stephen Harper.
For a century and a half, Canada’s Senate has been unelected and unaccountable. Unelected members can sit in the Senate for up to 45 years. It’s time to make Senators accountable to Canadians. But the Senate is stacked with a big Liberal majority. They don’t want change. They like things just as they are. They say they’re entitled to their jobs. That’s why Senate Liberals are delaying passage of S-4, the Conservative Government’s bill to cap Senate terms at eight years. Will the Senate ever change? Will Stéphane Dion ever be a leader? Visit www.notaleader.ca
Visit CanuckPolitics.com for more. February 16-17, 2010 – Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff slams Prime Minister Harper for making a cheap shot against the Liberal Party in an address to Canadian Forces in Haiti. Harper said the recent investment in the C-17 heavy-lift aircraft is an example of his government’s focus on increasing Canada ‘hard power’ capabilities, as opposed to the ’soft power’ policies of past governments. “I single out the C-17 for a reason. There was a time when that kind of heavy lift aircraft didnt fit Canadas soft power policies. But our government bought them for the hard power requirements of todays world. Now were using them for relief work. What is the moral of the story? To do soft power, you need hard power; you need a full range of capabilities.” – Stephen Harper “Every time Mr. Harper gets within a mile of Canadian military equipment, he takes a swipe at the Liberal Party Its inappropriate to use Haiti, to use a Canadian military base to make an attack on a political party Every time he takes a cheap shot like that, it just sours the atmosphere.” – Micheal Ignatieff
Jack Layton, leader of the NDP party, joins The Jack Layton got into federal politics in 2003, when he was elected leader of the NDP. And while he was new to Ottawa, Layton wasn’t a political rookie, he had already cut his teeth as a city councillor for nearly 20 years. He was a voice on the left of local Toronto politics who worked in the fight against AIDS, opposed Toronto’s bid for the 96′ Olympics and helped create the White Ribbon Campaign to stop violence against women. As leader of the NDP in Ottawa he’s run in two federal elections and played a big role in the House of Commons. But Layton wants more – he wants to be Prime Minister.
